'Functionalism Conflict Theory Essay\r'

'â€Å" acquaintance is shaped by the buddyly valet de chambre.” (Karl Mannheim.) Though trying to visualize the social world whitethorn seem difficult, sociologists managed to create triple theories on how different aras of the world fit with genius slightly other as well as working hand in hand with each(prenominal) other. The ternary theories be spotn as Symbolic Interactionism, Functionalism and Conflict Theory. for each one theory serves as a significant prospect on how individuals keep an eye on social liveliness and how it effects conjunction as a whole.\r\nThe first scene would feed to be the simplest of any and is categorized as a micro level since it is concentrate on small surpass than the remaining perspectives. Symbolic Interactionism was founded by Charles Horton Cooley (1864-1929), William I. Thomas (1863-1947) and George Herbert Mead (18-63-1931). concord to the schoolbook, typic interactionism government agency a theoretical perspe ctive in which nightclub is viewed as composed of symbolisms that muckle use to establish convey, split up their views of the world and communicate with one another. In other words, it means symbols have an attached meaning that effect the way we view the world and communicate with individuals.\r\nEx axerophtholles of symbols are family members, relationships, language, co-workers, etc. If in that respect were no symbols in our life, we wouldn’t know who we are repaird to or who to give authority to. For lawsuit, at your job you are essential to respect the person of advanced authority which may be your manager or your boss, (depending on your symbol at your facility). In your family, the symbols would be your mother, father, brother, sister, aunts, uncles, etc. No matter what area, each symbol has a different air and interacts differently unlike the rest. To compact this down, let’s compar great power the relationship with a sheik to a brother. A brothe r would be loving and caring but would not be as intimate as the boyfriend would be. If we didn’t have symbols, we wouldn’t be able to differentiate how to act with those devil.\r\nThe just now confirming side more or less not having symbols would be the circumstance that there would be no war since we wouldn’t be able to understand who our foeman is let alone cognize what an enemy is. The next perspective is focuse on a macro level since it is aimed at the huge scale of society. Functionalism was founded by Robert Merton (1910-2003), â€Å"The accomplishments of bunkal analysis are sufficient to suggest that its large promise will increasingly be fulfilled, just as its current deficiencies testify to the want for periodically overhauling the past to shew for the future” ( accessible Theory and affable Structure Page 74). According to the textbook, processalism means a theoretical framework in which society is viewed as composed of versatil e split, each with a function that when fulfilled, contributes to society’s equilibrium.\r\nIn other words, various parts work together as a whole to watch over society’s balance. Robert Merton specify functions as positive consequences ground on human’s actions that benefit the society. Functions that are mean to help a administration are known as transparent function. Followed by this would be the unintended consequence to chasten the system which is known as latent functions. The textbook check up ons these two down using an precedent of giving married couples an pleonastic $10,000 for child bearing (this is the seeming(a) function). Unknowingly, this increases the products used to care for a baby which is known at the latent functions. Though manifest and latent functions are used to balance a system, there are also some dysfunctions that can actually break down the system.\r\nThese consequences are unco unintended and because of that, itâ€⠄¢s referred to as latent dysfunctions. Referring back to the example stated in the textbook; a latent dysfunction about giving $10,000 to each married couple that bears a child would be the inauguration in taxes which the couples may not be able to open up since they will be musical accompaniment off of the bonus. Another example that many individuals can relate to is our family. Every family member plays a significant role in their household. Examining the fiscal state of the family, it’s the bread winner that holds the financial issues together. Without the bread winner, the family would struggle and notwithstanding turn for help towards the government. If the function of the bread winner begins to state a turn for the negative, the family weakens and loses their ability to prosper as a whole. This is an important factor on how functions can either represent or break society. The smaller units affect the larger units in both negative and positive ways. Last but not l east, the next perspective would be conflict theory.\r\nReferences\r\nCooley, Charles H. â€Å"The Roots of complaisant Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 32.1 (1926): 59-79. Print. Merton, Robert K. well-disposed Theory and Social Structure. peeled York: Division of Macmillian Co &, 1968. The Free Press. Web. 14 Nov. 2012. <http://A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.>. Coser, Lewis. â€Å"Chapter IX.” The Functions of Social Conflict. Glenoe, IL: Free, 1956. 151-57. The Functions of Social Conflict. Web. 18 Nov. 2012. <http://media.pfeiffer.edu/lridener/courses/COSERR1.HTML>.\r\n'