The United States' use of atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was Research Paper - 1

The United States use of atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was non justified - Research Paper ExampleOn August 9, an other(a) flunk destruct Nagasaki (Truman, 1945). For those that condone its use, the moral questions are satisfied because, though numerous thousands were killed or maimed, the bomb saved many more thousands of lives on twain sides. If, in fact, the use of the atomic bomb averted an invasion of Japan and so saving more lives than were lost in the bombing of Hiroshima, the moral dilemma is indisputable. However, even for those of this opinion, the issue regarding the faith of the second bombing remains in dispute. This is not sufficient justification for others who believe the use of the bomb was wrong given any criteria of moral judgment. Deliberately attacking a civilian population is not considered morally acceptable regardless of any real or perceived outcomes. This view was and remains popularly held by both American civilians and the military this re asoning was not employed in this case, but why? Was it the passions of wartime, a justifiable act in this one instance or was the bombing wrong low any circumstance?In 1945, the U.S. was a country weary of war and its citizens deeply prejudiced against both the Japanese and Germans believing that both types of peoples were inherently evil. Though a ridiculous notion today, it is a approximately understandable sentiment given the nature of the circumstances at that time and overall acceptance of racialism during this period in American history. Following the end of the war, a poll conducted by Fortune cartridge holder found that nearly a quarter of the American people thought that the U.S. should have used many more atomic bombs on the Japanese before that country had the opportunity to surrender (Dower, 1986 54). These polling results accurately reflected the acute hatred that Americans directed towards the Japanese people during the conflict. President Truman himself, as well a s many other American political leaders, was not immune to these