Islams Problems come from within Essay Example for Free

Islams Problems come from within Essay* Criticism of propaganda type which world leaders give to persuade the world this isnt about Islam* Rushdie argues that by giving examples how it is a) support of Bin Laden b) the Islamic in concert coming for the jihad c) the anti-Semitism blaming Jews for the September 11th issues etc.* Rushdie suggests a reasoning for the above scripted from fear of the west taking over there old-fashioned traditional way of life.* He evince how it is about Islam many political movements are now guided by radical Islamic organizations much(prenominal) as the revolutionary Shiite of Iran or the Taliban. * Rushdie continues by introducing a vital key point to his article. He criticizes such political groups for blaming outsiders for all the ills of Muslim societies. He then suggests that they are to accept responsibility of their problems and then they whitethorn be able to solve their problems by themselves.* Rushdie continues by showing how many Musl ims are beginning to anticipate themselves such questions. He gives some specific examples of intellectuals of the Muslim world relating to that question.* He concludes by suggesting that the way to chastise the problem with terrorism today is by secularist-humanist principles which must be taken on by the Islam.In terms of what we have learned, we would have to say that Rushdie argument is valid. We can come to that conclusion by manifestly looking at his arguments Rushdie doesnt introduce new information in his conclusions relating to an argument. If the question of validity refers to the detail that Islam is the paper related to the terror attacks in September, then the argument can well be valid to a certain extent. However, it would morally be wrong to blame a religion for this mass murdering, as we sock that generalizing that all Muslims are murders, is wrong and invalid.Although, one could argue the majority of the arguments Rushdie makes, the way he wrote them they are valid.Rushdie presumably has a strong historical knowledge to support his articles arguments. However, I believe a great cover up of emotions came in play while expressing himself. We must not forget that Rushdies experience with the Islamic, (in direct reference to the fact he was ordered to be killed by a major Islamic leader) hence a mathematical bias on the issue. I fully understand such a standpoint as that of Rushdie I too, when am asked to support my countries actions in regard to the Palestinian terror attacks, tend to become emotional and very(prenominal) protective. Therefore I understand the pressure release Rushdie experiences while expressing himself. Therefore I can as well as say from experience that I do not think that in such a arouse Rushdie would exaggerate to a point of absurd.