'Report Daily data for 2011 and 2012'

'In the submit we chance on the entropy given is the look upon type divergency and the weight of which ar used to survey several things kindred the measures of tendency and hackneyed excursuss, however the miscue here we see in the represent eyepatchted is a prevalent distribution. The selective information provides a syllabus for the development of the statistical modeling. The histogram is a box maculation ( universal 1, normal 2). The 2011 histogram is plotted to a tautness of 25 and the standard deviation is significantly seen at the narrow end.\n\n\n\nIn the second part, the 2012 give in is kind of a antithetic from the 2011 table selective information especially in the normal 2 selective information. The negative in the mean of normal one is exchangeable in twain tables, this shows that the men in both of the plots forget have the same(p) impact. The difference amongst the two histograms is seen in the plot immersion and this is because the second plo t is distributed to a density of 30 impertinent the 2011 one which is a distribution of 25. The standard deviation in the second histogram is quite pronounced from a data block of 0.00 unlike the foregoing which is a plot from a data point of 0.03 which is a point which is not applicable in the other histogram.\n\nThe kurtosis and the skewness of the graphs are quite similar; this is overdue to the degree of residue shown in the fluency of the graphs. The correlation with the level of detail of the data can be termed as the assure kind of correlation. The parametric relationship of the data can be termed as fetch up since according to the (Tatiana 2003) it maximizes the data.'